Central Connecticut State University's student newspaper, The Recorder, was recently under scrutiny over a slight case of plagiarism in an opinion article. While the paper's Editorial Editor, Carol Davis, addressed the issue adequately in an April 14 editorial, there are still some issues I'd like to address as Editor in Chief.

Professor Vivian Martin of the CCSU Journalism Department said the mistake was common among students, particularly those in their first year of college. In a meeting with Professor Martin, the author, Managing Editor Ed Harris, Sue Sweeny of the Student Activities Leadership Department, and myself, we resolved to educate the author and future new writers in citation techniques as well as what typically constitutes plagiarism.
CCSU Political Science professor Toni Moran requested that an academic misconduct report be filed and sent to campus judicial. She believed that while most clubs wouldn’t be held to the same standard, The Recorder is in the public sphere and thus requires some kind of judicial-decided consequence.
First and foremost, The Recorder is a club, separate from the institution. Academic policies do not apply because of this. We adhere to our own laws and deal with problems internally in a manner that we see fit. Submitting the author's case of slight plagiarism, which was attributed to ignorance, to campus judicial based off academic misconduct is illogical since no course work was involved and a no grade given.
While Professor Moran was generally pleased with Carol Davis's editorial, I believe the issue should be put to rest. The author has dealt with Professor Martin for educational purposes. That's what The Recorder is: a learning experience. How are students, particularly freshman, supposed to learn if they are knocked down by the first blow?
No comments:
Post a Comment